Heads up for Realtors, homebuyers in DeKalb: Don’t bank on annexation

Posted by Dan Whisenhunt January 6, 2015

Annexation and cityhood will be a huge factor in the 2015 housing market in DeKalb County.

As we noted yesterday, local Realtors are already fielding questions about it from potential buyers. Proposals to create new cities in DeKalb are pushing cities to claim areas in unincorporated DeKalb for potential annexation before there are no areas left to claim.

The issue is confusing. Case in point: Decaturish received this email alert for a property listing for a home near Decatur.

The description listed “Just approved city of Decatur annexation!” as one of the home’s selling points.

But that doesn’t mean the property is going to become a part of Decatur.

What the listing is referring to is the Decatur City Commission’s recent approval of its annexation master plan. The master plan includes a map of areas the city would like to annex, a map that includes the property in the real estate listing we received. Buyers and Realtors should note that the annexation map is a few steps removed from becoming a reality.

First, the map will need to be introduced as local legislation in the General Assembly. State Rep. Mary Margaret Oliver, D-Decatur, said she will file a bill on Decatur’s behalf if the city asks her to, but no bill has been filed yet. The last time the city pursued an annexation bill, no one in the delegation would sponsor it.

Assuming Oliver introduces a bill on the city’s behalf, it must be approved by the General Assembly and signed by the governor. Then, once that’s done, it must be approved in a referendum by voters in the annexation area.

So there are several steps between being on the map and being in Decatur, or any other new city. If you see a property listing, how can you determine its annexation status?

A few months ago, Decaturish created an annexation cityhood map, which has been updated for 2015. Homebuyers and real estate agents can search for addresses within the map to determine a property’s status.

Here’s how:

1) Click here.

2) Type the property address in the search bar.

3) Once your address appears on the map, check it against the map key, which shows you the boundaries of cities in DeKalb County, the boundaries of proposed cities and the boundaries of annexation maps. If the property falls within an annexation area, then its status will only be settled once it is approved or rejected by voters.

But there’s an important caveat here. Property owners can also annex into a city using a petition method. Decatur has annexed property using the 60 percent petition method, which requires petitioners to get the signatures representing 60 percent of land owners and registered voters.

Brookhaven also annexed Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta and Executive Park using the petition method.

It’s possible that cities could approve petition annexations ahead of any action by the Legislature. It’s an evolving issue. We’re working to keep our annexation map up to date with all the latest changes, and we are encouraging readers to notify us of any changes we aren’t aware of. To reach us, email editor@decaturish.com.

About Dan Whisenhunt

Dan Whisenhunt is editor and publisher of Decaturish.com. https://www.linkedin.com/in/danwhisenhunt

View all posts by Dan Whisenhunt

  • Butter Beans

    I’ve seen other examples of falsely identified property listings spawned from the annexation…untidiness. Here’s one example of an unincorporated DeKalb property touted as a “cute Avondale home” in a “very desirable and great Avondale Estates neighborhood.” The posted zip code is incorrect too, which leads me to believe this listing is intentionally misleading. Yes, this neighborhood is on the recently approved Avondale annexation master plan. But, as Dan states, we’re a long way off from seeing how this will all shakes out.

    Any realtor working the area worth their salt should be following these developments daily. Or at the very least do a little homework before listing homes under false pretenses.


  • abmagic

    Dan, any reason you haven’t updated the map with Stone Mountain annexation plan?

    • Just checking my notes on that. I don’t think we had enough information on Stone Mountain’s plan to make a judgment one way or the other about its chances in the upcoming session. As I’ve explained in previous posts, for simplicity’s sake, we’ve tried to limit the map to what we believe has a reasonable chance of being considered in the 2015 session. Based on my emails, I think we weren’t ever able to get a clear read on it (Bear in mind I get a lot of emails, and may have missed something.) If you would, please send us the most up to date information you have and any other supporting documentation. Email is editor@decaturish.com. Thanks

New Ben Ad
Banner Decaturish 300x250_April
Decaturish_300x250 V. 3

Receive the Daily Email DIgest

* = required field