State Rep. Michele Henson purchased ad for Winship bill

Posted by Dan Whisenhunt March 4, 2015
Rep. Michele Henson. Source: Facebook

Rep. Michele Henson. Source: Facebook

This story has been updated. 

Decaturish has learned new details about a mysterious proposal for a city of Winship that will soon be introduced in the General Assembly.

The DeKalb Champion has confirmed that state Rep. Michele Henson, D-Stone Mountain, has purchased the ad, indicating the is the likely sponsor of the bill.

“Notice is given that there will be introduced at the regular 2015 session of the general assembly of Georgia a bill to incorporate a new municipality in DeKalb County called Winship to provide for related matters and for other purposes,” the text of the ad reads.

It will run in the Champion on March 5.

Other details about the Winship idea, including a proposed map, are not known. Decaturish reached out to Henson for comment, and this story will be updated when she responds.

There are several proposals for new cities and annexations in DeKalb County.

The new cities currently under consideration are Tucker, LaVista Hills, Greenhaven and Stonecrest. A city of Winship could be a wildcard that adds further confusion to an already muddled process. In addition to those cities, there are also annexation plans under consideration for Decatur, Avondale Estates and the city of Atlanta.

In spite of all of these plans for DeKalb County cities and annexations, there are still areas that aren’t in any map, like Medlock and portions of Scottdale. It’s possible that the new map could attempt to resolve some of those unincorporated islands left out of the current cityhood and annexation process. But what isn’t known is if the Winship map would overlap with any of the current cityhood and annexation plans.

On Tuesday, March 3, the proposed cities of Tucker and LaVista Hills were approved in a House subcommittee hearing. Those bills were approved by the Governmental Affairs Committee on Wednesday, March 4.

A bill for a city of Stonecrest was also introduced on March 4.

Allen Venet, with LaVista Hills Yes, said that during the subcommittee hearing on Tuesday, members approved the LaVista Hills and Tucker bills over the objections of state Rep. Mary Margaret Oliver, D-Decatur. Venet said Oliver was objecting to it because those bills overlapped with annexation proposals: LaVista Hills conflicts with a proposal for Atlanta annexation, and Tucker conflicts with a proposal for Stone Mountain.

Venet said state Rep. Billy Mitchell, D-Stone Mountain, countered that because those annexation proposals had not been introduced, technically there was no conflict. Rep. Oliver today clarified that she is not a member of the subcommittee and is not allowed to vote.

“Not a member of sub committee, wasn’t allowed to vote, but was making objections (to violation) of rules,” Oliver said via email.

Venet said he hadn’t heard about the Winship proposal before yesterday.

“I am going to take it with a grain of salt that it is for real,” he said. “My best guess is it might be somebody’s tactical idea to add even more confusion.”

Correction: An earlier version of this story contained incorrect information regarding Rep. Mary Margaret Oliver’s subcommittee membership. She is not a member of the subcommittee that approved the Tucker and LaVista Hills bill and therefore did not have a vote. 

About Dan Whisenhunt

Dan Whisenhunt is editor and publisher of

View all posts by Dan Whisenhunt

  • RAJ

    Word at the Capitol this afternoon,was Michele and Drenner are working on the Winship bill. Possible co-sponsors, won’t know until bill is actually filed.More comment later.

    • NotRaj

      What’s amazing is how silent Lee May and the rest of DeKalb govt has been on this issue. Makes me think that they either know something we don’t or they secretly want all of these cities to form!

      • RAJ

        No they don’t know something we don’t know. They spent their time and taxpayer money trying to prevent me from filing an ethics complaint today. I finally had to call Decatur police to fill out a report on this incident.

        • Mike

          Can you share the details of your complaint?

          • RAJ

            Simple….It is an amendment of a ethics complaint against Stan Watson for cell phone p-card abuse and political web site expenses. The new amendment includes current AJC findings and was judged to be a fast track to the DeKalb Ethics Board. When these instructions came to me by phone from a former FBI agent I promptly Sh** my pants and did what I was told!

          • DH

            The FBI ehh?

          • RAJ

            Ethics Board Chairman said in public at Tuesday night Ethics Board meeting that he had been contacted by several agencies…spooks are everywhere….I feel all warm and fuzzy and SO protected!

        • DH
  • abmagic

    Michelle Henson does not represent Stone Mountain as none of her district is in Stone Mountain. it is a city with real boundaries. any chance your publication would please refer to her going forward as d, tucker or d, green haven. thanks

Receive the Daily Email DIgest

* = required field