City Commission, School Board meet to discuss borrowing money for school construction

Posted by Dan Whisenhunt April 29, 2015
City Schools of Decatur Board of Education members and City Commissioners met on Monday, April 27, to discuss a bond request for school construction. Photo by Dan Whisenhunt

City Schools of Decatur Board of Education members and City Commissioners met on Monday, April 27, to discuss a bond request for school construction. Photo by Dan Whisenhunt

Decatur Mayor Jim Baskett on Monday told School Board members that the ball is in their court regarding a bond referendum to pay for school construction.

“If you guys decide you’re going to need a referendum, I think the mayor Pro-Tem has said we’re going to act as a pass through in this request, to see the people have an opportunity to decide for themselves,” Baskett said during a joint work session. “You don’t need to be waiting on us to make a decision.”

School Board Member Julie Rhame said the board will consider its formal request at its meeting in May.

“It will be great if you can vote on it by June 1,” she said.

What “it” will be has not been finalized. Current City Schools of Decatur enrollment is 4,300 students. CSD consultants project it will be more than 6,000 by 2020. Earlier this month the Atlanta Journal Constitution reported that the School Board had settled on a $75 million bond request, which would add new facilities to meet 93 percent of the system’s projected enrollment growth. It would raise taxes on a $500,000 home by $680 per year.

But that was apparently not the final word on the matter, based on the discussion that occurred Monday.

Decatur Mayor Pro Tem Kecia Cunningham said increasing taxes on city residents could effectively price many people out of the city. According to materials presented to commissioners, City Schools of Decatur estimates that less than 42 percent of all households in Decatur have children in the school system.

Cunningham said if people without kids in the school system sell their homes, the residents who replace them will be more likely to add children to the school system.

“I understand what you say your No. 1 concerns are, the kids,” Cunningham said. “My No. 1 concern is the health and viability of my city; 2 or 3 mills is what could be the thing that runs them out.”

Decatur attempted to provide some tax relief for the city’s senior citizens by asking the state Legislature to increase the city’s homestead exemption, but that effort failed.

The city’s attempts to annex more property also failed, leaving the city struggling to find space to build additional school buildings. One option that CSD is considering would turn the College Heights Early Childhood Learning Center into a K-5 school.

But according to the fact-sheet given to commissioners, if College Heights became a K-5 tomorrow, it wouldn’t have enough space to meet CSD’s needs.

Commissioners and School Board members also debated the significance of an online poll conducted by the city that asked residents what bond referendum they would support. Of the more than 540 people who responded, 79.5 percent supported a smaller $60 million bond referendum, and 67.8 percent supported a $75 million referendum. The poll found less support – 61 percent – for an $82 million referendum.

Cunningham said, “It’s not really a poll, not a scientific poll.”

School board members and other commissioners conceded the point. Still, it was the only measure of public sentiment that was readily available. The unscientific poll asked about support for alternatives to building new schools. An overwhelming majority – 82. 9 percent – favored more portable classrooms.

Speaking of which, ever hear two-story portables? Apparently they exist and it’s something CSD is considering, too.

But School Board members are against pursuing portables as a long-term solution due to their expense and temporary nature.

“They don’t solve the problem,” School Board Chairman Garrett Goebel said.

Read more: Here are photos of materials that commissioners were referring to during Monday’s joint work session. It includes a Q&A from City Schools of Decatur addressing common questions about CSD’s space issues. 

Page 1 - Click to enlarge

Page 1 – Click to enlarge

Page 2 - Click to enlarge

Page 2 – Click to enlarge

Page 3. Click to enlarge.

Page 3 – Click to enlarge.

Page 4 - Click to enlarge

Page 4 – Click to enlarge

Page 5 - Click to enlarge

Page 5 – Click to enlarge

Page 6 - Click to enlarge

Page 6 – Click to enlarge

Page 7 - Click to enlarge

Page 7 – Click to enlarge

Page 8 - Click to enlarge

Page 8 – Click to enlarge

Page 9 - Click to enlarge

Page 9 – Click to enlarge

Page 10- Click to enlarge

Page 10- Click to enlarge

Page 11 - Click to enlarge

Page 11 – Click to enlarge

Page 12 - Click to enlarge

Page 12 – Click to enlarge

Page 13 - Click to enlarge

Page 13 – Click to enlarge

Page 14 - Click to enlarge

Page 14 – Click to enlarge

Page 15 - Click to enlarge

Page 15 – Click to enlarge

Page 16 - Click to enlarge

Page 16 – Click to enlarge

Page 17 - Click to enlarge

Page 17 – Click to enlarge

Page 18 - Click to enlarge

Page 18 – Click to enlarge

 

About Dan Whisenhunt

Dan Whisenhunt is editor and publisher of Decaturish.com. https://www.linkedin.com/in/danwhisenhunt

View all posts by Dan Whisenhunt

  • Living in Decatur

    Dan. Assuming the increase in tax will go ahead in some form – are they going to go and revalue homes? And if so how and when? Will there be a delay and some people will end up having to pay tax retrospectively? Lots of homes out there have managed to sit under the radar due to not triggering a revaluation with any sort of renovation / landscaping that did not require a permit (which is usually the thing that triggers the revaluation) and yet the properties are valued well above what they actually pay taxes on.

    • I’m not sure. Good question and worth a follow-up. Just trying to think of who the right person to ask would be.

      • Talani

        Your tax liability changes for one of two reasons, property value and millage rate. If this passes, everyone’s taxes will change because the millage rage goes up. Your value doesn’t have to change. That is a separate issue.

        • Living in Decatur

          Yes, but there are many properties out there with a property value tax based on valuations that were done years and years ago. Selling / buying; renovation and landscaping seems to trigger a re evaluation but even then that is adhoc at best. While millage is different to property value – if they are basing the tax increase on property value, which is what they have been saying, those with recent property valuations will be hit harder with the increased tax more so than those who have no valuation for the past 10 years. I doubt our property has had a valuation for at least that, so am probably stupid to raise this point at all but in the interest of community fairness ….

      • Living in Decatur

        And then a flow on from that is if every property is valued at its current value and therefore every one pays the correct amount of property value tax then would there be a need for such a hike in tax to cover this expense?

  • An American Patriot

    C’mon folks, it’s not that hard. Instead of housing units on the Callaway Property, build a new Middle School. That would ensure that that whole block would contain schools and would be a perfect transition from MS to HS. We do not need any more traffic congestion in that area. What with The Trinity Triangle due to be finished, probably this year, traffic will be a nightmare if/when housing units are built on the Callaway Property. If the Boys/Girls Club Property doesn’t become a reality, what next? Folks, we’re running out of options and with the DeVry Property Gone With The Wind, let’s don’t make another awful, awful decision. DO WHAT’S RIGHT for the Citizens of Decatur.

Receive the Daily Email DIgest

* = required field