Dear Decaturish – Decatur’s chronic complainer complains again

Posted by Dan Whisenhunt September 10, 2015

We accept letters to the editor. All letters must be signed and are typically 400 to 800 words in length. We reserve the right to edit letters for length and content. To send your letter to the editor, email it to

Dear Decaturish,

Recently Decatur officials “fired back” a series of rehashed self-justifications for their planning actions previously discussed in’s letter to the editor, “A Brief Latter Day History of Decatur, GA”.

The development planning process was criticized as being fraught with potential difficulties for the citizens and their lifestyle. Citizens’ complaints about the Decatur downtown development have to do with impact on the adjoining neighborhoods, school overcrowding, rampant traffic increase, and inability to significantly participate in the planning process. The city’s “back fires” are summarized in

Public participation in the planning process was not addressed in the City’s return fire and it leads one to speculate on the underlying paradox: the elected officials obviously recognize that the voters were intelligent enough to elect them but seem to believe they are too damn dumb to contribute in any meaningful way to their decision making. The history of Decatur has been that the consequences of imperfect, outdated planning have been reactive rather than preventative through a proactive process involving all parties with a vested interest. After all, the bones of the city’s development plan date back to 1982 although they did tweak it a bit in 2010. Nothing is new in that regard.

The city’s response is unsatisfactory and incomplete. “Chronic complainers” is a bumbled attempt at a dismissive put-down because the appellation is quite suitable as city officials offer much to complain chronically about. So if the shoe fits, wear it.

Figure1. Overcrowded schools? What overcrowded schools? “Campus Maker” modular classrooms at Decatur High School occupied while additional classrooms are built. (Source: chroniccomplainer492.)

Figure1. Overcrowded schools? What overcrowded schools? “Campus Maker” modular classrooms at Decatur High School occupied while additional classrooms are built. (Source: chroniccomplainer492.)

Burgeoning enrollments in the City Schools of Decatur (CSD) are a major sore spot. A stroll down Howard Avenue adjacent to Decatur High School clearly shows the impact of current overcrowding there (Figure 1).

According to city officials, 45 children currently reside in some of the 579 multi-family residences (condos) previously built, although the way the analysis is presented is more than a little shaky.  Supposedly these students contributed to only 2 percent of the historical enrollment increase since the first condo was built in 1999. However, the condo residents as a whole are a markedly older demographic than the target renters for the new apartments. Nonetheless, taking city numbers at face value, this amounts to 7.8 percent percent of the units housing children (assuming 1 child per unit but the actual distribution of children among the individual residences does not affect the final outcome). If the new apartments bring children in the same proportion, then 7.8 percent of the total 621 apartments currently under construction will harbor about 48 children and it’s likely that these apartments will be occupied in 2016.

Figure 2. City Schools of Decatur enrollment history and projections in support of a 2015 bond initiative. (Source:

Figure 2. City Schools of Decatur enrollment history and projections in support of a 2015 bond initiative. (Source:

At least one Developer’s stated target market is young professionals. There are also the families that view apartment rent as the better alternative to DeKalb Schools or a more expensive private school – no one has data on this much discussed but unknown element.

It seems apparent to this chronic complainer that young renters’ children will mainly join the early elementary school cohort and thereby contribute to the overcrowding at Decatur High School when they enter grades 9 – 12 (Figure 2).  Thus the projected percentage increase in overcapacity at DHS is 48/554 = 8.7 percent so that when these kiddos get to high school in the 2020 timeframe, the overcapacity will be on the order of 602 students. (This analysis ignores any new students enrolling from the single-family dwellings in the surrounding neighborhoods.)

Admittedly, multi-family tenements yield more tax revenue than single-family homes much to the joy of the city officials but unfortunately it is too late. Figure 2 clearly shows that Decatur High has a problem and the problem is too many students. Will the increased tax revenue resolve the problem?  The numbers are projections, of course, and those incoming children, whatever their number, need to be educated. But it is also clear to any chronic complainer worthy of the sobriquet that the numbers, when contrasted with the protestations and machinations of the city officials, are indicative of the smoke they are blowing at their constituents.

And oh, by the way, as seen in Figure 2, CSD is preparing to float a $75 million bond issue to deal with the student overflow. Guess who gets to pick up the tab on that. Unfortunately, if the voters reject the bond measure when it comes up on November 3, the consequences for CSD and the school children of Decatur will be dire indeed. Whose lack of planning foresight brought about this mess?

We are now left with the remaining subject of traffic congestion. However, let’s defer and wait for all those parking structures associated with the apartments under construction to fill chucky jam full and then watch the fun as the cars attempt to egress onto the Commerce, West Ponce, and Trinity thoroughfares at morning rush hour. The chronic complainers reserve their right to complain.

– Terry Donovan

About Dan Whisenhunt

Dan Whisenhunt is editor and publisher of

View all posts by Dan Whisenhunt

  • Geoff

    The use of the word “tenement” in recent letters to Decaturish is a bit concerning. It’s a derogatory term at best – potentially a real insult to the current and future people who live in the apartments downtown, actually. And, technically, describes a type of multifamily housing with shared – down the hall – bathrooms. So it’s inaccurate in these cases. Like other words, phrases and symbols from American history, there is a lot of historical baggage associated with that word that make it “loaded.”

    Obviously letters to the editor do not have to be accurate, or logical, but it
    seems like insulting our community members who live in multifamily
    housing might cross a line? Maybe not. Just throwing it out there.

  • CoD_voter

    Agree completely.
    But put the thesaurus back on the shelf. Using “sobriquet” instead of “nickname” doesn’t make you seem any smarter. Just more snarky. You have snarky covered well already.

    That being said…I cant wait to vote out the officials who approved the traffic-jam-o-rama, ugly-parking-deck-monolith, wooden-fire-hazard, Arlo apartments.

    Interesting they just denied the renovation of the existing building downtown (I forget the name now..) using the same school overcrowding argument as the “chronic complainers”.

    So CoD planners; do students live in apartments and condos or not? You are talking out of both sides. The fires back just tells me that you don’t intend to listen to your constituents.

    I will remember this attitude in the voting booth, be sure of that.

  • Andrew

    No doubt thanks to the fine efforts of the Book Festival, Decatur’s now blessed with an abundance of authors such as Mr. Donovan skilled in dystopian young adult fiction. I’m just thankful his imaginatively disturbing alternate reality bears so little resemblance to the actual, real-world Decatur where I live, and where so many great people have transcended the armchair and contributed to creating a place routinely referenced by other communities as something of a role model.

    Clearly dedicated to his craft, I certainly hope Mr. Donovan is not so immersed in his work that he finds himself unable to exit his imagination from time to time. Without question, living day to day in the nightmare Decatur he’s constructed on paper would totally suck.

    • Daren Wang

      Don’t blame this on me.

  • Marty

    I agree with Andrew, Decatur is a great place to live, raise a family, and is often routinely referenced by other communities as something of a role model. For example, one wonders what dystopian, disturbing alternate reality the “Better Together” initiative is addressing? Perhaps different folks have different perspectives.

    Growth and development leads to many challenges: gentrification, diversity, schools, taxes, traffic, quality of life, etc. Voicing a perspective – should it be termed communicating concerns, issues, and challenges – or complaining?

    Are city officials/employees actually labeling city commissioners as chronic complainers? I am somewhat confused on this point, as all the commissioners recently expressed concern over the effect of development on city schools.

    Decaturish always provides an educational read, thanks Dan.

  • Keith

    If you are frustrated with the overcrowding of Decatur schools then most of the
    blame should be placed on Dekalb County and City of Atlanta School board members. Their incompetency and corruption has driven these desperate parents to Decatur. We are only 4 square miles compared to 132 in Atlanta and 271 in Dekalb.

    The increase in students has primarily come from the turnover of single family throughout the City. When we moved into the City 17 years ago you could count on one hand the number of students in our neighborhood. Now you can do the same with homes that don’t have students.

    The irrational fear of apartments is quite concerning for a supposedly educated populace. There have never been enough apartments in Decatur especially for a City with an urban core. I shopped for an apartment three years ago while renovating our house and was appalled by the choices and limited supply.

    The City pushed developers to build in the downtown area for years which cost them many developments. Twelve years ago I remember speaking to a developer frustrated with they City because they were not open to rezoning single family parcels for apartments. Now that urban is in demand we are getting what City planned for years ago.

  • cjs

    Maybe we should make all new renters sign pledges not to reproduce/adopt. Or institute a Decatur One Child Policy. /sarcasm /I’m kidding

  • Dec30030 Teacher

    Figure 1 shows trailers at DHS. Figure 2 (which looks like a press release from CSD) states DHS is “at capacity”. What is the capacity at DHS and if it were “at” I’d guess there wouldn’t be trailers yet. Who makes these press releases??

  • Steve Vogel

    I hope Mr Donovan finds time in November to not be among the 80% of eligible voters who typically do not cast ballots in local elections. For the first time in a long time, Decatur has contested seats for both City Commission and School Board with no incumbents, so there’s even less excuse for not voting.

Receive the Daily Email DIgest

* = required field